What we do

Plaintiff-side. Nothing else.

The firm acts only for claimants. Four kinds of work, described below without embellishment — including what each one is not.

Floor-to-ceiling shelves densely packed with thousands of individual paper files — Plate 02Widespread harm arrives as thousands of individual files. Each one is still somebody's claim.

Mass & individual arbitration

Two people passing claim documents across a table, one holding a page of charts — Plate 03Every file changes hands with a lawyer on the claimant's side of the table.

Many modern contracts route disputes into binding individual arbitration and bar class actions. When the same conduct injures thousands of people or businesses under such contracts, the remedy is not one big case — it is many individual ones, filed and managed in parallel.

We represent claimants in these programs end to end: eligibility and evidence verification before filing, damages calculated on each claimant's own records, and arbitration counsel prepared to try any individual claim to award. We also take single commercial arbitrations where the dispute warrants it.

Class actions

A crowd of pedestrians crossing a striped city crosswalk, seen from behind — Plate 04A class exists because the injured rarely know each other. The law lets them act as one.

Where no enforceable arbitration clause stands in the way, the class action remains the right tool for widespread, similar injuries. We investigate, file, and litigate class claims — and we are candid with prospective class representatives about what the role involves and how long the road is.

Because we also run arbitration programs, we evaluate forum questions without a thumb on the scale: some claims belong in court, some in arbitration, and the analysis should be driven by the contract and the facts, not by the firm's habits.

Antitrust & competition claims

A person working through printed financial charts with a pen, annotating figures — Plate 05Antitrust cases are won in the data. The overcharge has to be shown, line by line.

Antitrust injuries are pricing injuries: paying more, or being paid less, than a competitive market would allow. Federal law takes them seriously — a successful private claimant is entitled to three times its actual damages by statute.

The firm's damages work — overcharge models tied to the claimant's own data and supported by appropriate economic expertise — is central to how these matters are evaluated, in whatever forum they proceed.

Consumer & commercial claims

A café owner in an apron at a wooden table, working through a handful of receipts — Plate 06Most economic harm arrives in small denominations. It still belongs to someone.

A large share of modern economic harm arrives in small denominations: an unlawful fee, a systematic billing error, a term applied in a way the contract does not permit. Individually, these injuries are too small to chase; in aggregate, they are exactly the claims the firm was built to handle.

We evaluate these matters on the same standard as everything else we do: whether a properly built claim, honestly assessed, is worth the claimant's while — and we say so plainly when it is not.

What we don't doDefense work, general corporate practice, or matters outside the claimant-side focus described above. When a matter needs depth we don't have — a foreign jurisdiction, a specialist regulatory question — we bring in the right counsel and say so, rather than stretching. No outcome is guaranteed in any matter; prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

How these claims actually proceed